alabdy
07-19-2022, 04:08 AM
From the day Roe v. Wade was decided, some have seen the constitutional right to an abortion as an inferred right rather than a guaranteed one. That distinction has become a threat to the law’s survival. Guests: Sabrina Tavernise, a national correspondent for The New York Times, spoke with Adam Liptak, who covers the Supreme Court for The Times. For more information on today’s episode, visit nytimes.com/thedaily (https://www.nytimes.com/thedaily).
Background reading:
Because the court led by Chief Justice John Roberts tends toward incrementalism, it is more likely to hear cases that chip away at abortion rights (https://www.nytimes.com/2019/05/15/us/politics/supreme-court-abortion.html?smid=pc-thedaily) than to overturn Roe v. Wade directly.
But after nearly five decades, the anti-abortion movement is closer than it has ever been to dismantling Roe (https://www.nytimes.com/2019/05/18/us/anti-abortion-laws.html?smid=pc-thedaily).
أكثر... (https://www.nytimes.com/the-daily)
Background reading:
Because the court led by Chief Justice John Roberts tends toward incrementalism, it is more likely to hear cases that chip away at abortion rights (https://www.nytimes.com/2019/05/15/us/politics/supreme-court-abortion.html?smid=pc-thedaily) than to overturn Roe v. Wade directly.
But after nearly five decades, the anti-abortion movement is closer than it has ever been to dismantling Roe (https://www.nytimes.com/2019/05/18/us/anti-abortion-laws.html?smid=pc-thedaily).
أكثر... (https://www.nytimes.com/the-daily)